Monthly Archives: February 2011

Standing With Wisconsin

In Wisconsin, people are standing outside in 17 degree weather.  Here in Los Angeles, we were afraid that no one would show up if yesterday’s rain persisted.  But by 10 in the morning, the sky was a gorgeous blue, a perfect day to stand in solidarity with public union members outside the LA City Hall.

I was there representing the Internet, which shall be present at every rally of the 21st century.  This sign is awesome because its heavy-duty lamination will last forever and because in the future I can just cover up the “Scott Walker” and put in any person or thing I want.  Yes, you may borrow it.

From a couple blocks away, it was easy to find.  You just had to follow all the other people wearing red and white (badger colors) and carrying signs.  The turnout was great: I estimate a couple thousand, or using Fox News calculations, five or six million.

The cheeseheads were out in force, too, managing to look amazingly dignified.

And surprise, the Koch brothers showed up and gave a speech!  (These Koch brothers, naturally.)

Partway through the rally, we saw a distant force approaching.  Are they friend or foe?

It’s the March for Choice, arriving about 400 strong to lend their support!

After the rally, we actually did locate the opposition, who were LaRouche crazies, of all people.  It was smaller than the number of people who took pictures of my sign, and to nobody’s particular surprise, had the only especially uncivil signs at the entire event.

Also after the rally, I found another representative of the Internet!  Bad picture, I know, but I was primarily there to rally, not to photograph.  (She’s laughing at my sign.)

Good use of a Saturday?  Without a doubt.


The nationwide Rallies to Save the American Dream took place at every state capital in the nation, plus many other cities.  Estimates place the crowd in Madison today at a jaw-dropping 70-100,000.  It was all organized by, of course.  You can follow the Twitter hashtag #WeAreWI; the LAist has some more reports on the LA protest here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized


Jordan recently brought home the late-80s/early-90s show Quantum Leap, which has caused a great and glaring question to arise in my mind.

Namely: What is it with the synthesizer soundtracks from that era?  They do not make the show sound exciting or interesting or intended for an adult audience.  They make everything sound like educational programming.

Exhibit A: Quantum Leap, Macgyver, Knight Rider, Airwolf.

Exhibit B: 3-2-1 Contact, Square One, Reading Rainbow, Schoolhouse Rock.  (The only notable outliers were Bill Nye and the crowning achievement of educational programming theme songs, Carmen Sandiego.  As if you even need to follow that link.)

Sans video and lyrics, would you be able to tell which show was about a helicopter pilot and which show was about reading?

Maybe it’s just selection bias.  All I watched in the early 90s was educational programming, so I associate that sound with it.  And yet I don’t think so.  Synthesizer music is tame and bland and it just doesn’t belong in TV shows for grown-ups.  The 80s: Who knows what people were thinking?


Image from Wikimedia Commons.


Filed under Uncategorized

Oddity of the Week

In 1972, a writer named Geoffrey Hoyle wrote a children’s book about what he thought life would be like in the future: specifically, in the year 2010.  Years later, someone happened to pick up a copy of said book at a library discard sale and posted it on the internet.

And the internet made a collective decision: We liked Hoyle’s vision of the future which is now the present.  Parts of it are uncannily predictive, parts are hilariously inaccurate, and parts are adorably optimistic.  Also, he predicted the iPad.  And so launched the Facebook campaign to find Geoffrey Hoyle.

So far they’ve found his Facebook page but haven’t succeeded in talking to him yet.  He did make some comments in this BBC article, though.

Are we living in the future?  Perhaps.  But I don’t see jumpsuits catching on any time soon.


Filed under Uncategorized

A Statistical Analysis of Women’s Pastoral Roles

Scot McKnight of Jesus Creed posed this question a few days ago:

How many of you, in your church today  had a woman preach, a woman teach, or a woman lead worship? Second, how many of you have a woman who has the title of “pastor”?

He has received nearly 200 responses, which I have compiled into some interesting, if statistically meaningless, data, which I present here hopefully free of my usual veneer of sarcastic commentary.

Question 1: How many of you, in your church today,  had a woman preach, a woman teach, or a woman lead worship?

Yes: 104 total

  • 38 had a woman preach
  • 17 had a woman teach
  • 42 had a woman lead worship
  • 30 did not specify

No: 70 total

  • 28 have had women participate in these capacities in the past
  • 8 haven’t in the past (or didn’t specify), but would allow it
  • 12 would not allow it
  • 22 did not specify


  • 120 would allow women to serve in at least one of the mentioned capacities
  • 34 would not allow it or did not specify

Question 2: How many of you have a woman who has the title of “pastor”?

Yes: 87 total

No: 83 total

  • 5 have had female pastors in the past
  • 15 haven’t in the past (or didn’t specify), but would allow it
  • 20 would not allow it
  • 5 have no “pastor” or equivalent title
  • 37 did not specify


  • 107 would allow women to serve as pastors
  • 62 would not allow it, did not specify, or have no “pastor” role

I reiterate here that these statistics are not actually indicative of anything because of the large selection bias inherent in Scot McKnight’s readership: as a politely but vocally egalitarian blog, Jesus Creed tends to attract egalitarians, or at least people who are open to the viewpoint.

Here are a few other interesting trends that I noticed but didn’t enumerate:

  • Many “yes” responses were husband-wife pastoral teams.
  • UMC churches were the most widely represented among “yes” responses.
  • “No” responses were the most likely to quote a Bible verse (only 1 Tim. 2:12).

More statistics, methods, and caveats after the cut.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized